Eurasian Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 20 citations · 9 references
MedicineAnatomyRadiologyClinical AnatomyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCross-sectional AnatomyImaging AnatomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingRadiologic AnatomyRadiological AnatomyMagnetic ResonanceStereological EstimationSurface AreaSurface Area QuantificationT1-weighted ImagingUniform Random SamplingVertical SectionsVolume Quantification
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought to determine differences in estimations of surface area made by classical vertical uniform random (VUR) section series and vertical section series obtained perpendicular to a fixed horizontal plane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One volunteer subject (male, 25 years of age) with no neurological deficit was chosen at random from a bank of controls in the magnetic resonance (MR) image data library of the Department of Radiology. First, a soccer ball with known geometrical features (radius: 9.75 cm) was imaged using a T1-weighted MR scanner at 5-mm thickness (total 40 sections) to test the validity and reliability of surface area and volume measurements obtained via stereological methods. Second, T1-weighted MR section profiles were obtained from a volunteer individual. Surface area and volume estimation procedures were carried out using the Stereo Investigator 6, MicroBright-Field, Inc., USA. CONCLUSIONS: We determined that there are no differences in either surface area or volume estimations made using VUR sections and direct vertical sections. We have performed an exhaustive series analysis with a variety of objects.
9
Estimation of surface area from vertical sections
Adrian Baddeley, H. J. G. Gundersen, Luis M. Cruz‐Orive · Journal of Microscopy · 1986 · 1.1K citations
Estimation of length and surface of anisotropic capillaries
Torsten Mattfeldt, G. Mall · Journal of Microscopy · 1984 · 73 citations
Medicine, Anatomy, Cardiology +17