Publication | Closed Access
Comparative study of different spatial/spatial-frequency methods (Gabor filters, wavelets, wavelets packets) for texture segmentation/classification
18
Citations
8
References
2002
Year
Unknown Venue
Texture Classification/recognitionImage AnalysisMachine VisionFeature DetectionDifferent Spatial/spatial-frequency MethodsPattern RecognitionEngineeringBiometricsEdge DetectionGabor ExpansionAngular FiltersWavelets PacketsTexture AnalysisTexture RecognitionWavelet TheoryComparative StudyComputer Vision
The interest manifested into texture recognition has had a substantial growth since these past few years. Much research is focused on a joint space/spatial-frequency representation of images. This paper describes the comparison between different spatial/spatial-frequency methods involving Gabor filters and wavelets. Two applications are considered: image segmentation and texture classification/recognition. It has been seen that results can depend significantly on the method used to decompose the signal. Two aspects are mainly taken into account: the effect of an over-sampling of the frequency domain by a bank of filters, and the ability of 1D wavelets to segment/classify oriented textures. An improvement using angular filters with separable wavelets is demonstrated, while no noticeable amelioration is observed using Battle-Lemarie wavelets, as compared to Gabor filters.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1