New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 121 citations · 7 references
MedicineCardiologyClinical EpidemiologyEvidence-based PracticeOutcomes ResearchClinical Trial Data CollectionClinical Trial DesignClinical Trial Protocol ReviewClinical TrialsRandomized Comparative TrialsStudy DesignCardiovascular Outcome TrialsClinical Trial Outcome ReportingClinical Trial ReportsJournal Peer ReviewKaplan-meier Confidence IntervalsKaplan-meier Survival Estimates
BACKGROUND: Rapid publication of clinical trials is essential in order for the findings to yield maximal benefits for public health and scientific progress. Factors affecting the speed of publication of the main results of government-funded trials have not been well characterized. METHODS: We analyzed 244 extramural randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular interventions that were supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). We selected trials for which data collection had been completed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011. Our primary outcome measure was the time between completion of the trial and publication of the main results in a peer-reviewed journal. RESULTS: As of March 31, 2012, the main results of 156 trials (64%) had been published (Kaplan-Meier median time to publication, 25 months, with 57% published within 30 months). Trials that focused on clinical events were published more rapidly than those that focused on surrogate measures (median, 9 months vs. 31 months; P<0.001). The only independent predictors of more rapid publication were a focus on clinical events rather than surrogate end points (adjusted publication rate ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 3.53; P=0.004) and higher costs of conducting the trial, up to a threshold of approximately $5 million (P<0.001). The 37 trials that focused on clinical events and cost at least $5 million accounted for 67% of the funds spent on clinical trials but received 82% of the citations. After adjustment of the analysis for a focus on clinical events and for cost, trial results that were classified as positive were published more quickly than those classified as negative. CONCLUSIONS: Results of less than two thirds of NHLBI-funded randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular interventions were published within 30 months after completion of the trial. Trials that focused on clinical events were published more quickly than those that focused on surrogate end points. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
7
Publication bias in clinical research
Philippa Easterbrook, Radha Gopalan, Jesse A. Berlin et al. · The Lancet · 1991 · 3.1K citations · Full text
National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy
Adam L. Hersh, Marcia L. Stefanick, Randall S. Stafford · JAMA · 2004 · 980 citations
Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis
Joseph S. Ross, Tony Tse, Deborah A. Zarin et al. · BMJ · 2012 · 378 citations · Full text
Eileen Hsich, Eiran Z. Gorodeski, Eugene H. Blackstone et al. · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2010 · 173 citations · Full text