Dynamic change management for construction: introducing the change cycle into model‐based project management

Moonseo Park, Feniosky Peña‐Mora

System Dynamics Review · 2003 · 136 citations · 18 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Rework in construction significantly hampers project performance, so managers often mitigate it by altering downstream designs, yet such changes can trigger non‑value‑adding iterations that lead to schedule delays and cost overruns. The study aims to identify and compare the characteristics and behavior patterns of construction changes with those of rework. Change impact on project performance is examined by analyzing change characteristics, discovery status, and timing. The research results are integrated into a dynamic project model that, as demonstrated in a real‑world example, improves performance and is most effective when combined with reduced process time and enhanced coordination among project functions. © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract

Abstract In construction, rework (redoing previously completed work) has a considerable impact on pro‐ject performance. As a result, construction managers often avoid rework on problematic tasks by modifying the design and specification of downstream tasks (“change”). Such a managerial action, however, can disturb the construction sequence by triggering non‐value‐adding change iterations among construction processes, which often contributes to unanticipated schedule delays and cost overruns. In order to address this challenging issue, different characteristics and behavior patterns of construction changes are identified, and compared to those of construction rework. Change impact on project performance is analyzed according to change characteristics, and to discovery status and time. All research findings are then incorporated into a cohesive dynamic project model. An application example of the project model demonstrates how model‐based change management can enhance project performance in a real‐world setting by providing effective management plans and policy guidelines. Finally, it is concluded that the model‐based approach can be more effective, when combined with other managerial efforts such as reducing the process time and increasing the level of coordination among project functions. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

18