Business Ethics Quarterly · 2015 · 60 citations · 57 references
BusinessCorporate GovernanceBusiness EthicsCorporate Social ResponsibilityTheory Of JusticeNormative EthicsOrganizational EthicsRawlsian JusticeRawlsian Welfare Criterion
ABSTRACT: The major aim of this article is to show that John Rawls’s theory of justice cannot be applied effectively to questions of business ethics and corporate governance. I begin with a reading of Rawls that emphasizes both the critical and pragmatic nature of his theory. In the second section I look more closely at the notion of society’s “basic structure” and its place within Rawls’s theory. In the third section, I argue that “the corporation” cannot be understood as part of this basic structure and is not, therefore, a subject of justice for Rawls or his interpreters. Finally, I show that Rawls’s inability to speak to the corporation is a weakness, regardless of one’s particular view on the corporation. I conclude by considering what Rawls’s theory helps us to understand about the problems involved in integrating corporate governance, business ethics, and political philosophy.
57
Separation of Ownership and Control
Eugene F. Fama, Michael C. Jensen · The Journal of Law and Economics · 1983 · 19.1K citations
Karen Johnson, Robert Nozick · The Western Political Quarterly · 1975 · 7.8K citations
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement
Thaddeus Metz, John Rawls, Erin I. Kelly · The Philosophical Review · 2002 · 3.5K citations
Stakeholder Theory:<i>The State of the Art</i>
Bidhan L. Parmar, R. Edward Freeman, Jeffrey S. Harrison et al. · Academy of Management Annals · 2010 · 2.7K citations
Business, Accounting, Strategy +10