Archives of Surgery · 1987 · 97 citations · 8 references
Public HealthSurgeryCost-effectiveness AnalysisInfection PreventionWound HealingHealthcare-associated Infection PreventionInfection ManagementSurgical Infection ManagementWound CareWound CleansingWound ManagementCost Savings AnalysisCost Savings EvaluationCost-effectiveness Of DressingsDisposable Surgical DrapesDrape Contamination PreventionOperating Room Infection PreventionWound Contamination ReductionWound Dressings
A 21-month study involving 2181 clean and clean-contaminated general surgical procedures was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially available disposable gown and drape system vs a cotton system in reducing wound infection. The series in which the disposable spun-laced fiber system was used had a significantly lower overall infection rate (2.83% vs 6.5%) as well as better rates in clean (1.8% vs 3.8%) and clean-contaminated (4.8% vs 11.4%) procedures. This effect was independent of all other factors. The odds of developing a wound infection was 2 1/2 times higher with a cotton system than with a disposable system. Actual cost analysis from three types of hospitals showed lower costs with utilization of disposable gown and drape systems. Hospital charges were significantly higher for those patients developing wound infections. The results of the study demonstrated not only significant reduction in wound infection rates but also major cost savings when a disposable gown and drape system was used in the operating room.
8
Strike-through of Moist Contamination by Woven and Nonwoven Surgical Materials
Harold Laufman, William W. Eudy, ANNE M. VANDERNOOT et al. · Annals of Surgery · 1975 · 72 citations
Microbial penetration of surgical gown materials.
Schwartz Jt, Saunders De · PubMed · 1980 · 41 citations