Frequency Response Analysis of Current Controllers for Selective Harmonic Compensation in Active Power Filters

Cristian Lascu, Lucian Asiminoaei, Ion Boldea, Frede Blaabjerg

IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2008 · 333 citations · 22 references

Concepts

TL;DR

All controllers use arrays of resonant controllers—one per harmonic—to achieve zero phase shift and unity gain for selected harmonics, and the overall current controller is the superposition of these, implementable in various reference frames. This paper compares four current control structures for selective harmonic compensation in active power filters. The study compares harmonic and total closed‑loop transfer functions of each controller and validates the analysis with experiments on a 7‑kVA laboratory setup. Three of the four control schemes exhibit identical harmonic behavior despite differing implementations, whereas the fourth demonstrates superior robustness and can stably compensate higher‑frequency harmonics, with the maximum compensable frequency differing significantly among the methods.

Abstract

This paper compares four current control structures for selective harmonic compensation in active power filters. All controllers under scrutiny perform the harmonic compensation by using arrays of resonant controllers, one for the fundamental and one for each harmonic of interest, in order to achieve zero phase shift and unity gain in the closed-loop transfer function for selected harmonics. The complete current controller is the superposition of all individual harmonic controllers and may be implemented in various reference frames. The analysis is focused on the comparison of harmonic and total closed-loop transfer functions for each controller. Analytical similarities and differences between schemes in terms of frequency response characteristics are emphasized. It is concluded that three of them have identical harmonic behavior despite the fact that their implementation is significantly different. It emerges that the fourth one has superior behavior and robustness and can stably work at higher frequencies than the others. Theoretical findings and analysis are supported by comparative experimental results on a 7-kVA laboratory setup. The highest harmonic frequency that can be stably compensated with each control method has been determined, indicating significant differences in the control performance.

References

22