The Concept of Labor: Marx and His Critics

Sean Sayers

Science & Society · 2007 · 99 citations · 8 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Marx defines labor as a form‑giving activity, a view that has been critiqued for assuming a productivist model that fails to capture many traditional and emerging immaterial forms of work. The paper argues that the rise of immaterial labor in postindustrial society requires a fundamental revision of Marx’s concept of labor. The authors conclude that the notion of immaterial labor is unsound, yet Marx’s framework remains a useful lens for interpreting contemporary work.

Abstract

Marx conceives of labor as form-giving activity. This is criticized for presupposing a “productivist” model of labor which regards work that creates a material product — craft or industrial work — as the paradigm for all work (Habermas, Benton, Arendt). Many traditional kinds of work do not seem to fit this picture, and new “immaterial” forms of labor (computer work, service work, etc.) have developed in postindustrial society which, it is argued, necessitate a fundamental revision of Marx's approach (Hardt and Negri). Marx's theory, however, must be understood in the context of Hegel's philosophy. In that light, the view that Marx has a “productivist” model of labor is mistaken. The concept of “immaterial” labor is unsound, and Marx's ideas continue to provide an illuminating framework for understanding work in modern society.

References

8