Current Sports Medicine Reports · 2010 · 14 citations · 4 references
Public HealthInjury PreventionSports MedicineErgonomicsHuman PerformanceSports Injury PreventionErgonomic Injury PreventionHead Injury PreventionHelmet UseInjury Risk ReductionMusculoskeletal Disorder PreventionProtective EquipmentCompetitive AthletesCross-sectional Sampling DesignHelmet Use DeterminantsHelmet Wear BehaviorHelmet Wearing BehaviorMusculoskeletal Injury PreventionSports Helmet UseUsage Metrics
Using a cross-sectional survey design, this study sought to determine usage rates and barriers to the use of protective equipment in roughstock athletes. Between 2004 and 2006, amateur, collegiate, and professional roughstock athletes were surveyed using national organizational mailing lists. Findings revealed that during competition, 69% never wore a helmet. Barriers were a negative effect on performance and sport persona. Conversely, 88% always wore a vest. The perception that vest usage was required encouraged roughstock athletes to wear them. Mouthpiece use results were mixed; 58% always used and 21% never used a mouthpiece. Barriers were discomfort and frequent forgetfulness. Reported injury rate was high, with users noting fewer injuries to head and ribs than nonusers, and riders agreed that protective equipment prevented injury to the head, ribs, and mouth. However, equipment usage rates varied widely by type and seemed to be underutilized because the equipment affected performance, was uncomfortable, and "not cowboy."
4
Accidents with horses: what has changed in 20 years?
Jai Chitnavis, C. L. M. H. Gibbons, Martin B. Hirigoyen et al. · Injury · 1996 · 133 citations
Rodeo related large animal injury: is protective head-gear warranted?
Loren H. Ketai, R. Thomas Temes, Joan L. Deis et al. · Injury · 2000 · 17 citations