European Sociological Review · 2009 · 360 citations · 56 references
Social SciencesSocial PsychologySociologyGroup DynamicsIntergroup RelationsSocial InequalityDiversityEthnic MinoritiesGroup DiversitySocial CapitalSocial CohesionSocial StratificationEthnic Diversity AnalysisInterethnic ContactIntergroup CohesionMulti-level PerspectiveSocial Cohesion AnalysisSocioeconomic Disadvantage
Studies have linked ethnic diversity to lower social capital, implying diversity harms social cohesion. This article argues that social cohesion is multifaceted and requires examining diversity’s effect on interethnic relations. The authors use a sensitive diversity typology based on proportional size, number, and type of ethnic groups to reveal varied cohesion outcomes. Results show diversity reduces social capital but improves interethnic relations and tolerance through bridging ties, yet disadvantage has the strongest negative impact on both social capital and interethnic relations.
A number of studies have found a negative relationship between ethnic diversity and social capital and assumed from this a harmful effect of diversity on social cohesion. This article suggests that social cohesion must be treated as a multifaceted concept and any analysis into the relationship between diversity and social capital needs to be complemented by an analysis of diversity’s effect on ‘relations between ethnic groups’. Our results show that while increasing diversity does have a negative impact on social capital, it simultaneously improves perceptions of, and relations between, ethnic groups. Furthermore, we find that forming ‘bridging’ ties in diverse environments plays a significant role in the positive relationship between diversity and tolerance, and that the presence of ‘bridging’ ties can also reduce the negative impact of diversity on social capital. However, while our results show that diversity has both positive and negative effects on social cohesion, we find that it is disadvantage which has the most detrimental impact, undermining both social capital and interethnic relations. We also find evidence that using a more sensitive measure of diversity (creating an area typology based on the proportional size, number, and type of ethnic groups in an area) reveals that living in different structures of diversity may lead to different social cohesion outcomes.
56
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
Choice Reviews Online · 2000 · 29K citations
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith‐Lovin, James M. Cook · Annual Review of Sociology · 2001 · 18.6K citations
Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 14.5K citations
Edward Simpson · Nature · 1949 · 14K citations · Full text
Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital
Robert D. Putnam · Journal of democracy · 1995 · 14K citations