IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2001 · 131 citations · 3 references
ManagementOperations ManagementRisk ManagementOptimizationRevenue ManagementSchedulingHydropower EngineeringHydropower OperationsOptimization Under UncertaintyRisk-sensitive Decision MakingStochastic OptimizationStochastic ProgrammingHydropower EconomicsHydropower OptimizationHydropower SchedulingInflow Uncertainty ManagementStochastic Dual Dynamic ProgrammingStochastic Dynamic OptimizationStochastic Dynamic Programming
Earlier practice in Scandinavia has been to separate operations scheduling and contract management. The paper describes the implementation of a new integrated tool for risk management in hydropower systems. The authors integrate operation scheduling and future‑contract hedging into a single model, control risk by setting revenue targets and penalizing shortfalls to define a utility function, allow dynamic contract portfolio changes, and solve the resulting large stochastic dynamic optimization problem with stochastic dynamic programming and stochastic dual dynamic programming. Simulations demonstrate that the new tool substantially improves profit in the lower range, making it useful for hydropower companies confronting price risks alongside inflow uncertainty in deregulated markets.
The paper describes the implementation of a new integrated tool for risk management in hydropower systems. Earlier practice in Scandinavia has been to separate operations scheduling and contract management. In the present approach operation scheduling and hedging by future contacts are integrated in one model. The risk level is controlled by setting revenue targets. Revenues below target are penalized; this implicitly defines a revenue utility function to reduce risk. The possibility of dynamically changing the future contract portfolio is now represented. The resulting large stochastic dynamic optimization problem is solved using a combination of stochastic dynamic programming and stochastic dual dynamic programming. Simulations for a test case show that the profit in the lower range is considerably improved with the new tool. The approach can be useful for hydropower companies that face price risks in addition to the inflow uncertainty, as is the case in a deregulated system.
3
"Capital Investment and Financial Decisions."
Richard C. Stapleton, Haim Kedar‐Levy, Marshall Sarnat · The Journal of Finance · 1980 · 337 citations