LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2006 · 11 citations · 8 references
EngineeringMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceMaterials ProcessingPolymer EngineeringSurface EngineeringAcrylic Resin MaterialsAcrylic Resin ProcessingSurface FinishingSurface MetrologySurface PreparationSurface RoughnessAcrylic Resin Surface CharacteristicsHeat-cured Acrylic Resin ProcessingHeat-polymerized Acrylic Resin ProcessingMechanical PolishingMicrowave-cured Acrylic ResinPolishingPolishing Of Acrylic ResinSurface Roughness Parameters
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of polymerization \nmethods (microwave energy - MW, and water bath - WB) and polishing \ntechniques (chemical - C and mechanical - M) on the surface roughness \nof one heat-polymerized acylic resin (Vipi-Cril). Forty acrylic resin \ndisk-shaped samples were made according to ADA specification n° \n12. Half of samples were processed by microwave energy (500W for 3 \nminutes), and the other half by water bath (74±1 °C for 9 \nhours). After deflasking, the samples were trimmed with a sequence of \nabrasive aluminum oxide sandpapers of different grades (180, 220 and \n400) and divided in 4 groups according to polymerization methods and \npolishing techniques: G1: MW+CP, G2: MW+MP, G3: WB+CP and G4: WB+MP. \nSurface roughness values were measured using a Surfcorder SE 1700 \nrugosimeter (Kosaka Laboratory Ltd, Kosaka, Japan). Mann-Whitney test \n(p=.05) indicated significant differences between polishing methods \nprocessed by microwave energy (p= .0018), and between polishing methods \nprocessing by water bath (p= .0002). Samples processed by both methods \n(water bath or microwave energy) showed smoother surfaces when polished \nby mechanical polishing method, and polymerization methods did not \ninfluence in surface roughness.
8