Surface roughness of acrylic resins processed
\nby microwave energy and polished by mechanical and chemical process

Célia Marisa Rizzatti‐Barbosa, Morgana Nicoleti Gabriotti, Laís Regiane Silva-Concílio, Fábio Alves Jóia, Cristiane Machado, Margarete Cristiane Ribeiro

LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2006 · 11 citations · 8 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of polymerization
\nmethods (microwave energy - MW, and water bath - WB) and polishing
\ntechniques (chemical - C and mechanical - M) on the surface roughness
\nof one heat-polymerized acylic resin (Vipi-Cril). Forty acrylic resin
\ndisk-shaped samples were made according to ADA specification n°
\n12. Half of samples were processed by microwave energy (500W for 3
\nminutes), and the other half by water bath (74±1 °C for 9
\nhours). After deflasking, the samples were trimmed with a sequence of
\nabrasive aluminum oxide sandpapers of different grades (180, 220 and
\n400) and divided in 4 groups according to polymerization methods and
\npolishing techniques: G1: MW+CP, G2: MW+MP, G3: WB+CP and G4: WB+MP.
\nSurface roughness values were measured using a Surfcorder SE 1700
\nrugosimeter (Kosaka Laboratory Ltd, Kosaka, Japan). Mann-Whitney test
\n(p=.05) indicated significant differences between polishing methods
\nprocessed by microwave energy (p= .0018), and between polishing methods
\nprocessing by water bath (p= .0002). Samples processed by both methods
\n(water bath or microwave energy) showed smoother surfaces when polished
\nby mechanical polishing method, and polymerization methods did not
\ninfluence in surface roughness.

References

8