Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Adaptive Media Playout for Low-Delay Video Streaming Over Error-Prone Channels

220

Citations

14

References

2004

Year

TLDR

Best‑effort networks require client buffering to avoid playout interruptions, but larger buffers increase latency. The paper proposes adaptive media playout (AMP) to vary frame playout speed based on channel conditions, thereby reducing buffer size and latency while maintaining a target underflow probability. AMP is analyzed using a streaming system model with deadline‑constrained ARQ and a two‑state Markov channel model, and a Markov chain analysis evaluates the latency–underflow tradeoff. Analysis and simulations confirm that AMP substantially improves the latency–underflow tradeoff, achieving lower latencies for the same underflow probability.

Abstract

When media is streamed over best-effort networks, media data is buffered at the client to protect against playout interruptions due to packet losses and random delays. While the likelihood of an interruption decreases as more data is buffered, the latency that is introduced increases. In this paper we show how adaptive media playout (AMP), the variation of the playout speed of media frames depending on channel conditions, allows the client to buffer less data, thus introducing less delay, for a given buffer underflow probability. We proceed by defining models for the streaming media system and the random, lossy, packet delivery channel. Our streaming system model buffers media at the client, and combats packet losses with deadline-constrained automatic repeat request (ARQ). For the channel, we define a two-state Markov model that features state-dependent packet loss probability. Using the models, we develop a Markov chain analysis to examine the tradeoff between buffer underflow probability and latency for AMP-augmented video streaming. The results of the analysis, verified with simulation experiments, indicate that AMP can greatly improve the tradeoff, allowing reduced latencies for a given buffer underflow probability.

References

YearCitations

Page 1