Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2000 · 72 citations · 20 references
Life SciencesImmunologyInfectious DiseasesClinical ImmunologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyAntigen Detection AssaysComplement SystemEnzyme-linked Immunosorbent AssayPathogen DetectionSerological DiagnosisSerological DiagnosticsAntibody Detection TestsComplement Fixation TestsEnzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa)Immunodiagnostic AssaysIndirect Fluorescent Antibody AssayPathogen Antigen DetectionPathogen Detection SensitivityReference Method Comparison
A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of Q fever (PanBio Coxiella burnetii immunoglobulin M [IgM] ELISA, QFM-200) was compared to the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) for C. burnetii IgM and the complement fixation test (CFT). The ELISA demonstrated 92% agreement with the reference method (IFAT), and gave a sensitivity of 99% (69 of 70 samples) and a specificity of 88% (106 of 121). Specificity can be increased with confirmation by IFAT. CFT was found to have a specificity of 90% (107 of 119), although it was lacking in sensitivity (73%; 51 of 70). No cross-reactivity was observed in the ELISA with serum samples from patients with mycoplasma (n = 6), chlamydia (n = 5), or legionella (n = 4) infections, although 2 of 5 patients with leptospirosis and 1 of 4 samples containing rheumatoid factor (RF) demonstrated positive results in the ELISA. Results indicate that the performance of the PanBio C. burnetii (Q fever) IgM ELISA (F = 187) is superior to that of CFT (F = 163), and consequently the ELISA should be a useful aid in the diagnosis of acute Q fever.
20
William Winslow, D. J. Merry, M. Pirc et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 1997 · 139 citations · Full text
Immunoglobulin responses in acute Q fever
Georges Dupuis, O Péter, M G Peacock et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 1985 · 122 citations · Full text