Memory and Mystery: The Cultural Selection of Minimally Counterintuitive Narratives

Ara Norenzayan, Scott Atran, Jason Faulkner, Mark Schaller

Cognitive Science · 2006 · 385 citations · 44 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study hypothesizes that myths and folktales are more culturally stable when they follow a minimally counterintuitive template and tests this by examining memory advantage and its link to cultural success. Study 1 used a controlled laboratory experiment to test the memory advantage of MCI templates, while Study 2 applied archival analysis to examine the cognitive structure of Grimm Brothers folktales. The results show that MCI templates produce a memory advantage after one week, that successful folktales are more likely to fit an MCI template, and that memory processes play a key role in cultural evolution.

Abstract

Abstract We hypothesize that cultural narratives such as myths and folktales are more likely to achieve cultural stability if they correspond to a minimally counterintuitive (MCI) cognitive template that includes mostly intuitive concepts combined with a minority of counterintuitive ones. Two studies tested this hypothesis, examining whether this template produces a memory advantage, and whether this memory advantage explains the cultural success of folktales. In a controlled laboratory setting, Study 1 found that an MCI template produces a memory advantage after a 1‐week delay, relative to entirely intuitive or maximally counterintuitive cognitive templates. Using archival methods, Study 2 examined the cognitive structure of Grimm Brothers folktales. Compared to culturally unsuccessful folktales, those that were demonstrably successful were especially likely to fit an MCI template. These findings highlight the role of human memory processes in cultural evolution.

References

44