Correlation of p53 mutations with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy and shortened survival in ovarian cancer.

Angela Reles, Wen H. Wen, Annette Schmider, Conway Gee, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Uta Kilian, Lovell A. Jones, Adel K. El‐Naggar, C. Minguillon, I Schönborn,

PubMed · 2001 · 284 citations · 68 references

Concepts

Abstract

PURPOSE: The p53 tumor suppressor gene plays a central role in cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis. We analyzed p53 alterations and their impact on response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome in ovarian cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred seventy-eight ovarian carcinomas, snap frozen and stored at -80 degrees C, were analyzed for mutations of the p53 gene (exons 2-11) by single-strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing and for p53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (monoclonal antibody DO7). RESULTS: p53 mutations were found in 56% (99 of 178) of the tumors, and 62% of these were located in evolutionary highly conserved domains of the gene. Time to progression and overall survival were significantly shortened in patients with p53 mutations compared with wild-type p53 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.014) and patients with mutations in highly conserved domains as opposed to nonconserved domains or wild-type p53 (P = 0.010 and P = 0.007). p53 protein overexpression (>10% positively stained nuclei) was found in 62% (110 of 178). Time to progression and overall survival were shorter in cases with p53 overexpression (cutpoint, 10%: P = 0.071 and P = 0.056) but only marginally significant. Resistance to adjuvant cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy was significantly more frequent in patients with p53 overexpression (P = 0.001) or p53 missense mutations (P = 0.008) than patients with normal p53. CONCLUSIONS: p53 alterations correlate significantly with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, early relapse, and shortened overall survival in ovarian cancer patients in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis though, p53 was not an independent prognostic factor.

References

68