Brazilian Dental Journal · 2011 · 24 citations · 19 references
DentistryDental Materials ScienceRestorative DentistryDental MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsSurface Properties Of Dental MaterialsAdhesive Bonding For Indirect RestorationsAdhesive DentistryComposite Resin RestorationsDental AdhesivesDentin BondingDenture Base MaterialsAdhesive Bonding To DentinAdhesive Failure AnalysisBond Failure ModesBond StrengthSelf-adhesive Resin SystemsSelf-etch AdhesionSilicon CarbideSilicon Carbide Composites
This study analyzed the bond strength (BS) of HEMA versus HEMA-free self-etch adhesive systems to dentin. The occlusal surface of 20 third molars was removed and the dentin was abraded with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. The teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 5) and restored with GO, Adper SE Plus, OptiBond All-In-One, and Clearfil 3S Bond adhesive systems and Filtek Z350 composite. After light curing (600 mW/cm²), the teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 ºC for 24 h and were sectioned in the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions to obtain sticks (0.8 mm²). The sticks were subjected to tensile force using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min), and the modes of failure were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. The BS data (in MPa) were treated using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests at 5% significance. GO presented the lowest mean bond strength value (10.57 ± 3.72) and differed significantly from the other materials (p = 0.001), which, in turn, presented statistically similar results (p>0.05) among themselves: Adper SE Plus (29.08 ± 8.93), OptiBond All-In-One (28.36 ± 6.49), and Clearfil 3S Bond (28.62 ± 6.97). Mixed fractures were the most prevalent. It was concluded that the influence of HEMA on BS to dentin was material dependent.
19