American Ethnologist · 1984 · 98 citations · 16 references
Language StudiesEnglishLinguisticsAnthropological LinguisticsPsycholinguisticsSemanticsCognitive SemanticsComparative SemanticsConceptual SemanticsLanguage ClassificationLexical SemanticsTaxonomyCategorical SemanticsHierarchical CategorizationLexical Semantic CategorizationLinguistic CategorizationSemantic StructureSemantic TypesTaxonomic RelationsWord Classification
This paper examines the semantic structure of English classificatory terms in the area of concrete lexicon, linking differences in semantic structure with differences in grammatical characteristics of different classes of nouns. I argue that in recent literature on human categorization the strictly taxonomic categories (i.e., categories based on hierarchies of kinds) have not been distinguished from other types of categories. I discuss four types of supercategory that do not stand for “a kind of thing”: two different types of collective supercategories that stand for heterogeneous collections of things, a supercategory that stands for heterogeneous classes of materials, and a supercategory of purely functional concepts . [semantics, categorization, taxonomy, ethnobiology, cognition]
16
Basic objects in natural categories
Eleanor Rosch, Carolyn Β. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray et al. · Cognitive Psychology · 1976 · 5.5K citations
C. P. D., Eleanor Rosch, Barbara B. Loyd · The American Journal of Psychology · 1979 · 5.3K citations
Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets?
Michael McCloskey, Sam Glucksberg · Memory & Cognition · 1978 · 523 citations · Full text