Fukushima in review: A complex disaster, a disastrous response

Yoichi Funabashi, Kay Kitazawa

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · 2012 · 177 citations · 2 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami crippled the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, creating a complex crisis worsened by communication gaps between government and the nuclear industry. An independent panel from the Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation examined how the government, Tokyo Electric Power Company, and other actors responded to the disaster. The panel concluded that the government, Tepco, and related agencies were unprepared at almost every level, a failure rooted in a long‑standing myth of absolute safety, internal dysfunction, and unclear public‑private roles that hindered anticipation of the tsunami and effective crisis management.

Abstract

On March 11, 2011, an earthquake and tsunami crippled the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. The emerging crisis at the plant was complex, and, to make matters worse, it was exacerbated by communication gaps between the government and the nuclear industry. An independent investigation panel, established by the Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation, reviewed how the government, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco), and other relevant actors responded. In this article, the panel’s program director writes about their findings and how these players were thoroughly unprepared on almost every level for the cascading nuclear disaster. This lack of preparation was caused, in part, by a public myth of “absolute safety” that nuclear power proponents had nurtured over decades and was aggravated by dysfunction within and between government agencies and Tepco, particularly in regard to political leadership and crisis management. The investigation also found that the tsunami that began the nuclear disaster could and should have been anticipated and that ambiguity about the roles of public and private institutions in such a crisis was a factor in the poor response at Fukushima.

References

2