Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2014 · 109 citations · 34 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgerySurgeryMedical RoboticsOrthopedic BiomechanicsOrthopedicsArthroplasty BiomechanicsImplant BiomechanicsKnee ArthroplastyRobot-assisted SurgeryRobotic-assisted ArthroplastySurgical RoboticsBone Resection AccuracyBone Resection PlanningCadaveric Knee TestingImage-based Implant PlanningRobotic Arm-assisted SurgeryRobotic-assisted Knee ArthroplastySurgical Implant Placement
BACKGROUND: Surgical robotics has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and soft tissue balance in unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, although extensive data have emerged with regard to a CT scan-based haptically constrained robotic arm, little is known about the accuracy of a newer alternative, an imageless robotic system. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous freehand robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in UKA using cadaveric specimens. METHODS: In this controlled study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 25 cadaveric specimens undergoing UKA using the new tool. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants. RESULTS: The femoral implant rotational mean error was 1.04° to 1.88° and mean translational error was 0.72 to 1.29 mm across the three planes. The tibial implant rotational mean error was 1.48° to 1.98° and the mean translational error was 0.79 to 1.27 mm across the three planes. CONCLUSIONS: The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. The next step will be to determine whether accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.
34