Applied Immunohistochemistry · 2001 · 114 citations · 18 references
MedicinePathologyDiagnostic PathologyHistopathologyImmunotechnologyAntigen Detection AssaysAssay ValidationEnzyme-linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunohistochemistryStaining TechniquesAnalytical Methods DevelopmentAutomated Staining PlatformsDiagnostic ImmunohistochemistryImmunohistochemical DetectionImmunohistochemical MarkersImmunohistochemical StainingImmunohistochemistry AssaysInterlaboratory Reproducibility
Over the last few years, the role of immunohistochemical analysis has been changing from that of an ancillary diagnostic technique to that of a stand-alone diagnostic method, the results of which determine treatment approach. With this change comes a need for increasing standardization of both preanalytical and analytical methods, so that results emanating from different laboratories are directly comparable. These efforts have been aided to some degree by the development of automated staining systems and by the increased use of test kits, but interlaboratory reproducibility for immunohistochemical methods is still far lower than that of most clinical analytical measurements. In this article, the author presents some approaches to further reduce intra- and interlaboratory variation in the performance of immunohistochemical assays, focusing attention on guidelines recently published by NCCLS.
18
S M Hsu, Laurence Raine, Herbert Fanger · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · 1981 · 14.3K citations · Full text
Ludwig A. Sternberger, Paul H. Hardy, John J. Cuculis et al. · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · 1970 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens
Juha Kononen, Lukas Bubendorf, Anne Kallionimeni et al. · Nature Medicine · 1998 · 4.1K citations
Timothy W. Jacobs, Allen M. Gown, Hadi Yaziji et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1999 · 459 citations · Full text