Tacit Knowledge in Expert Coaching: Science or Art?

TLDR

Coaching blends scientific principles such as motor skill acquisition, sociology, and physiology, yet intuitive coaching is often mischaracterized as art; the key lies in how coaches develop, access, and apply tacit knowledge, highlighting a need for clearer development pathways in coach education. The article aims to clarify coaching expertise by examining how expert coaches develop and apply tacit knowledge, with implications for coach education. Effective coach education must be grounded in knowledge and understanding rather than mimicry, shaping future educational approaches.

Abstract

Effective coaching is a mixture of pedagogy and principles of sciences, e.g., motor skill acquisition, sociology, and physiology, often referred to as the science of coaching. Instinctive or intuitive coaching has often been incorrectly viewed as the art of coaching. More important should be how coaches develop knowledge, how they access that knowledge at the appropriate times and how this affects their decision-making process. The study of expert coaches should allow inferences to be drawn from their development and applied to coach education. This article intends to clarify coaching expertise and examine the role of tacit knowledge within coaching. The lack of a clear development pathway for aspiring expert coaches is a clear indicator that the current coach education system needs review. Any effective education system should be based on knowledge and understanding rather than mimicry and the implications for the future of coach education are considered.