2012 · 52 citations · 16 references
ManagementBusiness EconomicsEconomicsGame TheoryIncentive SystemsReward SystemsBehavioral IncentivesIncentive CompatibilityIndividual IncentivesMonetary IncentivesPerformance-based RewardsTwo-sided MarketsCrowdsourced ParticipationCrowdsourcingCrowdsourcing Decision-makingPrize-based IncentivesStrategic Product ChoiceStrategic Resource Choice
We investigate the design of mechanisms to incentivize high quality outcomes in crowdsourcing environments with strategic agents, when entry is an endogenous, strategic choice. Modeling endogenous entry in crowdsourcing markets is important because there is a nonzero cost to making a contribution of any quality which can be avoided by not participating, and indeed many sites based on crowdsourced content do not have adequate participation. We use a mechanism with monotone, rank-based, rewards in a model where agents strategically make participation and quality choices to capture a wide variety of crowdsourcing environments, ranging from conventional crowdsourcing contests with monetary rewards such as TopCoder, to crowdsourced content as in online Q&A forums.
16
American Economic Review · 2012 · 6.8K citations
R. Preston McAfee, John McMillan · Scholarship@Western (Western University) · 1986 · 1.9K citations · Full text
The Optimal Allocation of Prizes in Contests
Benny Moldovanu, Aner Sela · American Economic Review · 2001 · 897 citations
The all-pay auction with complete information
Michael R. Baye, Dan Kovenock, Casper G. de Vries · Economic Theory · 1996 · 835 citations · Full text
Auctionin Entry into Tournaments
Richard L. Fullerton, R. Preston McAfee · Journal of Political Economy · 1999 · 475 citations
Business, Economics, Auction Theory +11