Practice Validity, Reflexivity and Knowledge for Social Work

Michael Sheppard

The British Journal of Social Work · 1998 · 134 citations · 8 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Recent work has reexamined social work knowledge, integrating epistemological, ethical, and theoretical perspectives and introducing concepts such as process knowledge, reflexivity, and hypothesis formation. This article responds to Susan White’s critique and expands the discussion toward a general theory of social work knowledge. It centers on three dimensions: the primacy of practice validity, a social‑work‑specific notion of reflexivity, and the risks of unchecked relativism.

Abstract

In the last few years there have been significant developments in conceptualizing the role and nature of knowledge in social work. This has been based on a fundamental review of epistemological, ethical and theoretical facets of social work and its knowledge base. Amongst some of the most significant developments have been the emergence of new concepts (for social work) such as process knowledge, reflexivity and a range of ideas relating to hypotheses. In a recent article, Susan White (1997) sought to critique some of my ideas on this matter. This article represents a response to her paper; one which uses the opportunity to draw out wider issues for a general theory of social work knowledge. In particular, it focuses on three key dimensions: the centrality of the concept of practice validity, the importance of a concept of reflexivity which is not simply transferred from the discipline of sociology but which has a social work-specific meaning, and the dangers of an unrestrained relativism.

References

8