Open Space Communities: Resident Perceptions, Nature Benefits, and Problems with Terminology

TLDR

In residential communities, open space is valued, yet its definition varies widely, carrying significant environmental and social implications. The study aimed to investigate how residents of conventional and conservation subdivisions perceive open space. The authors surveyed residents in the same township about their nearby natural environment and other residential aspects. Participants prioritized nature views from home, but preferred wooded views were scarce in conventional communities, revealing misunderstandings about open space preservation and prompting recommendations for communication, ordinances, and joint environmental and human benefits.

Abstract

Abstract Abstract In residential communities, "open space" is generally considered desirable. Yet what is meant by this term differs widely, with far-reaching environmental and social implications. To investigate these differing perceptions, we queried residents of conventional and conservation subdivisions in the same township regarding their nearby natural environment and other aspects of their residential context. While study participants considered "nature view from home" a top priority, the content of these views differed substantially. The most preferred views, of wooded areas, were relatively unavailable in the conventional communities. Yet these subdivisions might more accurately be experienced as "open." The results of our study thus point to the potential for misunderstandings about "open space" preservation. We conclude with suggestions concerning communication, ordinances, and opportunities for simultaneously benefiting people and the environment.