Publication | Open Access
Perspectives for Genomic Selection Applications and Research in Plants
401
Citations
81
References
2014
Year
Plant GeneticsGeneticsGenomicsGenomic SelectionPlant GenomicsGenomic PredictionGenotype-phenotype AssociationMolecular EcologyBreedingPhenotype DataQuantitative GeneticsPhenotyped IndividualsStatistical GeneticsMolecular BreedingGenetic VariationPopulation GeneticsPlant BreedingNatural SciencesEvolutionary BiologyNew ModelsPopulation GenomicsMedicineGenomic Selection Applications
Genomic selection has generated excitement in breeding communities and offers opportunities to accelerate genetic gain and improve selection accuracy in plants. The review aims to outline how genomic prediction can be integrated into breeding programs, emphasizing cost‑benefit considerations and the strategic use of markers and phenotypes. The authors discuss integrating genomic prediction through marker‑assisted selection, novel experimental designs, multi‑trait models, and genotype‑by‑environment analyses. Early empirical and simulation studies show promise, yet achieving genetic gains requires optimal resource allocation and new models to improve predictions with distantly related training individuals.
ABSTRACT Genomic selection (GS) has created a lot of excitement and expectations in the animal‐ and plant‐breeding research communities. In this review, we briefly describe how genomic prediction can be integrated into breeding efforts and point out achievements and areas where more research is needed. Genomic selection provides many opportunities to increase genetic gain in plant breeding per unit time and cost. Early empirical and simulation results are promising, but for GS to deliver genetic gains, careful consideration of the problem of optimal resource allocation is needed. Consideration of the cost‐benefit balance of using markers for each trait and stage of the breeding cycle is needed, moving beyond only focusing on recurrent selection with GS on a few complex traits, using prediction on unphenotyped individuals. With decreasing marker cost, phenotype data is quickly becoming the most valuable asset and marker‐assisted selection strategies should focus on making the most of scarce and expensive phenotypes. It is important to realize that markers can also improve accuracy of selection for phenotyped individuals. Use of markers as an aid to phenotype analysis suggests a number of new strategies in terms of experimental design and multi‐trait models. GS also provides new ways to analyze and deal with genotype by environment interactions. Lastly, we point to some recent results showing that new models are needed to improve predictions particularly with respect to the use of distantly related individuals in the training population.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1