Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · 2013 · 131 citations · 0 references
Abuse DetectionCommunicationJournalismCensorship“ UhPast TenseMedia ActivismSocial MediaCyberpsychologyConversation AnalysisPolitical CommunicationDiscourse AnalysisLanguage StudiesImpoliteness StudiesComputer-mediated CommunicationHate SpeechCommunication EffectsPopular CommunicationCovert StrategiesOnline HarassmentPerceived StrategiesInterpersonal CommunicationSocial ComputingMass CommunicationArts
This paper investigates the phenomenon known as trolling — the behaviour of being deliberately antagonistic or offensive via computer-mediated communication (CMC), typically for amusement’s sake. Having previously started to answer the question, what is trolling? (Hardaker 2010), this paper seeks to answer the next question, how is trolling carried out? To do this, I use software to extract 3,727 examples of user discussions and accusations of trolling from an eighty-six million word Usenet corpus. Initial findings suggest that trolling is perceived to broadly fall across a cline with covert strategies and overt strategies at each pole. I create a working taxonomy of perceived strategies that occur at different points along this cline, and conclude by refining my trolling definition.