Concepedia

Abstract

We use a minimal model to study the effects of the upper electronic states on the rate of a charge transfer reaction. The model consists of three ions and an electron, all strung on a line. The two ions at the ends of the structure are held fixed, but the middle ion and the electron are allowed to move in one dimension, along the line joining them. The system has two bound states, one in which the electron ties the movable ion to the fixed ion at the left, and the other in which the binding takes place to the fixed ion at the right. The transition between these bound states is a charge transfer reaction. We use the flux–flux correlation function theory to perform two calculations of the rate constant for this reaction. In one we obtain numerically the exact rate constant. In the other we calculate the exact rate constant for the case when the reaction proceeds exclusively on the ground adiabatic state. The difference between these calculations gives the magnitude of the nonadiabatic effects. We find that the nonadiabatic effects are fairly large even when the gap between the ground and the excited adiabatic state substantially exceeds the thermal energy. The rate in the nonadiabatic theory is always smaller than that of the adiabatic one. Both rate constants satisfy the Arrhenius formula. Their activation energies are very close but the nonadiabatic one is always higher. The nonadiabatic preexponential is smaller, due to the fact that the upper electronic state causes an early recrossing of the reactive flux. The description of this reaction in terms of two diabatic states, one for reactants and one for products, is not always adequate. In the limit when nonadiabaticity is small, we need to use a third diabatic state, in which the electron binds to the moving ion as the latter passes through the transition state; this is an atom transfer process. The reaction changes from an atom transfer to an electron transfer, as nonadiabaticity is increased.

References

YearCitations

Page 1