Circulation · 2005 · 518 citations · 44 references
MedicineCardiologyEpidemiologic MethodsEpidemiologyRisk Factor AnalysisCardiac Risk AssessmentCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular Disease PreventionCardiovascular EpidemiologyCardiovascular RiskCoronary Artery DiseaseCardiovascular Risk Stratification Using LipoproteinsCoronary Heart Disease EpidemiologyCoronary Heart Disease Risk ScoresLipid Risk AssessmentLow-density Lipoprotein ParticlesPlasma Cholesterol LevelsRelative Risk Estimation
Apolipoprotein B levels indicate the concentration of atherogenic lipoproteins, while non–HDL cholesterol reflects the cholesterol carried by these particles. The study compared apoB, non–HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and other lipid markers as predictors of coronary heart disease in a large nested case‑control cohort of 18,225 men. A nested case‑control design was used, selecting 266 men who experienced myocardial infarction or fatal CHD over six years and matching each case to two controls by age, blood draw date, and smoking status. Both non–HDL cholesterol and apoB were strong CHD predictors, but when adjusted for each other only apoB remained significant, and triglycerides added predictive value to non–HDL cholesterol but not to apoB.
Background— Apolipoprotein B (apoB) plasma levels reflect the concentration of proatherogenic lipoproteins very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), whereas non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) levels reflect the concentration of cholesterol transported by these particles. Methods and Results— The aim of our study was to compare apoB, non–HDL-C, LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and other lipid markers as predictors of coronary heart disease (CHD) in a nested case-control study among 18 225 participants in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Among men who were free of diagnosed cardiovascular disease at the time of blood collection, 266 had nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal CHD during 6 years of follow-up. Through the use of risk set sampling, control subjects were selected at a 2:1 ratio and matched with regard to age, date of blood collection, and smoking status. After adjustment for matching factors, the relative risk of CHD in the highest quintile compared with the lowest quintile was 2.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66 to 4.58) for non–HDL-C, 3.01 (95% CI, 1.81 to 5.00) for apoB, 1.81 (95% CI, 1.12 to 2.93) for LDL-C, 0.31 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.52) for HDL-C, 2.41 (95% CI, 1.43 to 4.07) for triglycerides (all P trend <0.001), and 1.42 (95% CI, 0.86 to 2.32, P trend =0.19) for lipoprotein(a). When non–HDL-C and LDL-C were mutually adjusted, only non–HDL-C was predictive of CHD. When non–HDL-C and apoB were mutually adjusted, only apoB was predictive; the relative risk was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.30 to 13.49; P trend =0.02) for apoB compared with 0.70 (95% CI, 0.21 to 2.27; P trend =0.72) for non–HDL-C. Triglycerides added significant information to non–HDL-C but not to apoB for CHD risk prediction. Conclusions— Although non–HDL-C and apoB were both strong predictors of CHD in this male cohort, more so than LDL-C, the findings support the concept that the plasma concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles measured by apoB is more predictive in development of CHD than the cholesterol carried by these particles, measured by non–HDL-C.
44
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 35.7K citations
Scott M. Grundy · JAMA · 1993 · 27.9K citations
Enzymatic Determination of Total Serum Cholesterol
Charles C. Allain, Lucy S Poon, Cicely S G Chan et al. · Clinical Chemistry · 1974 · 9.2K citations · Full text