Publication | Closed Access
How Low Can You Go? The Impact Of Reduced Benefits And Increased Cost Sharing
17
Citations
12
References
2002
Year
Financial ProtectionPrimary CareCare BacklashEconomic AnalysisManaged CareLow CanPublic HealthInsuranceHealth Services ResearchHealth Insurance ReformEconomicsPublic PolicyHealth PolicyHealth InsuranceActuarial ModelOutcomes ResearchCostbenefit AnalysisShared ServiceNational Health InsuranceCost SharingHealth Care DeliveryHealth EconomicsReduced BenefitsBusinessSharing EconomyHealth Care Cost
Amid escalating health care costs and a managed care backlash, employers are considering traditional cost control methods from the pre-managed care era. We use an actuarial model to estimate the premium-reducing effects of two such methods: increasing employee cost sharing and reducing benefits. Starting from a baseline plan with rich benefits and low cost sharing, estimated premium savings as a result of eliminating five specific benefits were about 22 percent. The same level of savings was also achieved by increasing cost sharing from a 15 dollars copayment with no deductible to 20 percent coinsurance and a 250 dollars deductible. Further increases in cost sharing produced estimated savings of up to 50 percent. We discuss possible market- and individual-level effects of the proliferation of plans with high cost sharing and low benefits.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1