52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference · 2011 · 26 citations · 3 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringMechanical EngineeringActuatorsAerodynamicsVibrationActuator DesignRotor DynamicsRotorcraft AerodynamicsRotorcraft StructuresRotordynamicsVibration ControlActuated StructuresBlade Pitch AngleFlapsResonance FrequenciesRotor Blade AerodynamicsRotor Blade Twist DeformationUnsteady Aerodynamic EffectsVibration Reduction
Helicopter main rotors are characterized by complex unsteady aerodynamic conditions, which \nare causing vibrations and noise in and around rotary wing aircrafts. The aerodynamic conditions \nalso cause increased drag, which leads to higher fuel consumption. Even modern helicopters still \nsuffer from these drawbacks. This is why there are many efforts to influence the flow conditions \nby passive and active means. Active means have the advantage to adapt to varying demands, \nwhich can change significantly. A first attempt is to perform a sinoidal variation of the pitch \nangle of the blades with a frequency that is an integer multiple of the rotor frequency, the so \ncalled higher harmonic frequencies. This can be done by additional displacements of the swash \nplate or by a variation of the pitch link length using actuated pitch links. Since both designs have \nseveral drawbacks, one of the most promising approaches is the realization of a secondary \ncontrol via the deformation of individual blades. Such an actuation can be realized by blade flaps \nor by the integration of piezoelectric actuators in the blade itself, which causes the blade to twist. \nAt the DLR such twist blades have been investigated intensively. A series of blades has been \nbuilt using thin skin integrated actuators. This Paper gives an overview of all active twist blades \nwith skin integrated actuators that have been designed and manufactured at the DLR so far. \nDifferent design philosophies have lead to different geometrical setups. A comparison of the \nblades power consumption for given control laws for noise and vibration reduction is also given. \nFinally, a unique testing technique for nondestructive measurement of mass distribution is \ndiscussed in this paper. \nare characterized by complex unsteady aerodynamic conditions, which \nare causing vibrations and noise in and around rotary wing aircrafts. The aerodynamic conditions \nalso cause increased drag, which leads to higher fuel consumption. Even modern helicopters still \nsuffer from these drawbacks. This is why there are many efforts to influence the flow conditions \nby passive and active means. Active means have the advantage to adapt to varying demands, \nwhich can change significantly. A first attempt is to perform a sinoidal variation of the pitch \nangle of the blades with a frequency that is an integer multiple of the rotor frequency, the so \ncalled higher harmonic frequencies. This can be done by additional displacements of the swash \nplate or by a variation of the pitch link length using actuated pitch links. Since both designs have \nseveral drawbacks, one of the most promising approaches is the realization of a secondary \ncontrol via the deformation of individual blades. Such an actuation can be realized by blade flaps \nor by the integration of piezoelectric actuators in the blade itself, which causes the blade to twist. \nAt the DLR such twist blades have been investigated intensively. A series of blades has been \nbuilt using thin skin integrated actuators. This Paper gives an overview of all active twist blades \nwith skin integrated actuators that have been designed and manufactured at the DLR so far. \nDifferent design philosophies have lead to different geometrical setups. A comparison of the \nblades power consumption for given control laws for noise and vibration reduction is also given. \nFinally, a unique testing technique for nondestructive measurement of mass distribution is \ndiscussed in this paper.
3
Evolution of Active Twist Rotor Designs at DLR
Hans Peter Monner, Steffen Opitz, Johannes Riemenschneider et al. · 2008 · 22 citations
Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +16