Forest Ecology and Management · 2008 · 147 citations · 59 references
Natural ResourcesEnvironmental ManagementForestryCarbon ManagementForest EcologyForest ManagementCarbon SequestrationCarbon Stock AssessmentCarbon Stock EstimationCarbon StorageForest Ecosystem ManagementSustainable Forest ManagementBiomass Carbon StorageCarbon Allocation In TreesCarbon ForestryCarbon Management PlanningCarbon Sequestration-oriented SelectionDeadwood Carbon Stock AssessmentForest Carbon Dynamics
We present a new approach to maximize carbon (C) storage in both forest and wood products using optimization within a forest management model (Remsoft Spatial Planning System). This method was used to evaluate four alternative objective functions, to maximize: (a) volume harvested, (b) wood product C storage, (c) forest C storage, and (d) C storage in the forest and products, over 300 years for a 30,000 ha hypothetical forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Effects of three initial forest age-structures and a range of product substitution rates were tested. Results showed that in many cases, C storage in product pools (especially in landfills) plus on-site forest C was equivalent to forest C storage resulting from reduced harvest. In other words, accounting for only forest, and not products and landfill C, underestimates true forest contributions to C sequestration, and may result in spurious C maximization strategies. The scenario to maximize harvest resulted in mean harvest for years 1–200 of 3.16 m3 ha−1 yr−1 and total C sequestration of 0.126 t ha−1 yr−1, versus 0.98 m3 ha−1 yr−1 and 0.228 t ha−1 yr−1 for a scenario to maximize forest C. When maximizing total (forest + products) C, mean harvest and total C storage for years 1–200 was 173% and 5% higher, respectively, than when maximizing forest C; and 218% and 6% higher, respectively, when maximizing substitution benefits (0.25 t of avoided C emissions per m3 of lumber used) in addition to total C. Initial forest age-structure affected harvest in years 1–50 < 34% among the four alternative management objective scenarios, and resulted in mean C sequestration rates of 0.31, 0.10, and −0.14 t ha−1 yr−1 when maximizing total C storage for young, even-aged, and old forests, respectively. Our results reinforce the importance of including products in forest-sector C budgets, and demonstrate how including product C in management can maximize forest contributions toward reduced atmospheric CO2 at operational scales.
59
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
Richard N. Cooper, J. T. Houghton, James J. McCarthy et al. · Foreign Affairs · 2002 · 13K citations
Natural Sciences, Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences +14
Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change
Werner A. Kurz, Caren C. Dymond, G. Stinson et al. · Nature · 2008 · 2K citations
Life Sciences, Ecology, Entomology +14
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Robert Jandl, Marcus Lindner, Lars Vesterdal et al. · Geoderma · 2006 · 1.5K citations
Agriculture, Forestry, Soil Sciences +12