Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Effects of Mild and Severe Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Efficiency in Tolerant and Susceptible Barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) Genotypes

100

Citations

49

References

2014

Year

Abstract

Abstract Drought stress is one of the most important abiotic factors which adversely affect growth, metabolism and yield of crops worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of drought stress on photosynthesis in barley and examine the differential responses of photosynthetic apparatus in relatively tolerant (Yousof) and susceptible (Morocco) barley genotypes. Plants were subjected to different levels of soil water availability including control, mild and severe drought stress. In both genotypes, drought stress led to decrease in chlorophylls, β‐carotene and stomatal conductance accompanied by decrease in CO 2 assimilation rate. Significant increase in α ‐ tochoperol content was only observed in Yousof cultivar under drought stress. Initial slope and plateau phase of CO 2 response curve of drought‐stressed plants as well as polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient curve ( OJIP test) and fast fluorescence induction kinetics were influenced by drought stress. These parameters were more affected in Morocco cultivar by drought stress compare with Yousof. Drought stress also resulted in reduction of D1 protein content in both genotypes and accelerated photoinhibition process. Based on our results, stomatal conductance is the main factor limiting photosynthesis in Yousof genotype under mild drought stress. However, in Morocco, in addition to stomatal limitation, damage to photosystem II ( PSII ), reduced electron transport and carboxylation efficiencies were important parts of limitation in photosynthesis. Severe drought stress resulted in structural and biochemical impairment of light‐dependent reactions as well as carboxylation process of photosynthesis in both genotypes. Alpha‐tocopherol showed an important protective role against drought stress in Yousof cultivar as a relatively drought‐tolerant cultivar.

References

YearCitations

1976

225.3K

1976

209.3K

1981

4.7K

2008

3.9K

1993

2K

2002

2K

1996

1.6K

1995

990

1999

927

2001

517

Page 1