Annals of Surgery · 2004 · 158 citations · 34 references
MedicineOncologySurgerySurgical OncologySurgical PathologyTumor PathologyCancer StagingCancer Survival AnalysisColorectal CancerPrognostic AssessmentTumor GradingTumor StagingHistologic GradeInvasive Tumor BuddingPrognostic Grading ScalesPrognostic Grading SystemsPrognostic PredictionPrognostic Prediction ModelsPrognostic Staging ModelsPrognostic Staging Systems
In Brief Objective: To clarify the appropriateness of tumor “budding,” a quantifiable histologic variable, as 1 parameter in the construction of a new prognostic grading system for rectal cancer. Summary Background Data: Patient division according to an accurate prognostic prediction could enhance the effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant therapy and follow-up. Patients and Methods: Tumor budding was defined as an isolated cancer cell or a cluster composed of fewer than 5 cells in the invasive frontal region, and was divided into 2 grades based on its number within a microscopic field of ×250. We analyzed 2 discrete cohorts comprising 638 and 476 patients undergoing potentially curative surgery. Results: In the first cohort, high-grade budding (10 or more foci in a field) was observed in 30% of patients and was significantly associated with a lower 5-year survival rate (41%) than low-grade budding (84%). Similarly, in the second cohort, the 5-year survival rate was 43% in high-grade budding patients and 83% in low-grade budding patients. In both cohorts, multivariate analyses verified budding to be an independent prognosticator, together with nodal involvement and extramural spread. These 3 variables were given weighted scores, and the score range was divided to provide 5 prognostic groups (97%; 86%; 61%; 39%; 17% 5-year survival). The model was tested on the second cohort, and similar prognostic results were obtained. Conclusions: We propose that because of its relevance to prognosis and its reproducibility, budding is an excellent parameter for use in a grading system to provide a confident prediction of clinical outcome. Based on 2 discrete cohorts of rectal cancer patients, tumor “budding” was identified as a reproducible independent prognostic indicator that can improve the erroneous staging of advanced disease as early-stage disease. A grading system using the 3 parameters (tumor depth, nodal involvement, and budding) provided a wider spectrum of 5-year survival rates (18–98%).
34
RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCER
Richard J. Heald, R. D. H. Ryall · The Lancet · 1986 · 2.7K citations
LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTION
Philip Quirke, Michael F. Dixon, P. Durdey et al. · The Lancet · 1986 · 2K citations
The classification of cancer of the rectum
Cuthbert Dukes · The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology · 1932 · 1.5K citations
Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer
I. J. Adam, I.G Martin, Pj Finan et al. · The Lancet · 1994 · 1K citations