Journal of Applied Ecology · 2009 · 491 citations · 25 references
Natural ResourcesEcologyLand-use PlanningAgricultural Landscape EcologyEcological RestorationRestoration EcologyAfforestationAgricultural Land ManagementDeforestationGround Cover AssessmentLand UseVegetation Cover AssessmentAgricultural Land Use ImpactsOvergrazing EffectsPercent Vegetation CoverVegetation CoverVegetation Cover DeclineVegetation Cover Recovery
China’s Grain for Green Project rapidly altered land use and ground cover, impacting biodiversity. The study conducted field surveys from 1998 to 2005 to assess the landscape-level effects of the project and illustrate the successes and failures of large-scale ecological restoration. Vegetation cover rose from 29.7 % to 42.2 %, yet afforestation intensified water shortages, reduced cover and species diversity in plots, and tree planting often harmed vulnerable areas; livestock exclusion and cultivation cessation had the greatest positive impact, indicating that managers should prioritize reducing grazing and farming intensity over afforestation, using native species that do not worsen water scarcity. The study offers synthesis and practical applications for ecological restoration.
Summary China's Grain for Green Project is a rapid landscape‐scale shift in ground cover and land use with significant implications for biodiversity. From 1998 to 2005, we carried out field studies to examine the landscape‐level impacts of this project, and to provide a practical example of the successes and failures of a large‐scale attempt to restore a vulnerable environment. In a northern part of China's Shaanxi Province, our results indicated that the total vegetation cover in areas covered by this project increased from 29·7% in 1998 to 42·2% in 2005. However, we also found evidence that large‐scale afforestation in this vulnerable arid and semi‐arid region could increase the severity of water shortages, decrease vegetation cover in afforestation plots, and adversely affect the number of species present. The exclusion of livestock from overgrazed areas and the elimination of cultivation in marginal areas had the biggest effects on the restoration of vegetation cover, whereas tree planting had a strong negative effect in vulnerable areas. Synthesis and applications . In practical terms, the destruction of natural vegetation cover during afforestation should be avoided, as this makes the soil surface more vulnerable to erosion and reduces species diversity. Managers should reduce the intensity of farming and grazing on fragile land rather than relying on afforestation as the primary tool for ecological restoration in arid and semi‐arid areas. Afforestation remains a valuable tool but should be limited to the planting of native or other species that will not exacerbate soil water shortages such as stable communities of natural desert steppe, maximum water‐use efficiency dwarf shrubs, and possibly even lichen species in more severely degraded environments.
25
China's environment in a globalizing world
Jianguo Liu, Jared M. Diamond · Nature · 2005 · 1.6K citations
Social Sciences, Development Studies, Environmental Sciences +10
Restoration of Degraded Tropical Forest Landscapes
David Lamb, Peter D. Erskine, John A. Parrotta · Science · 2005 · 1.4K citations
Natural Resources, Ecology, Forestry +15
The Effects of Plant Composition and Diversity on Ecosystem Processes
David U. Hooper, Peter M. Vitousek · Science · 1997 · 1.4K citations
Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands
Robert B. Jackson, Jay L. Banner, Estéban G. Jobbágy et al. · Nature · 2002 · 1K citations
China's Forest Policy for the 21st Century
Peichang Zhang, Guofan Shao, Guang Zhao et al. · Science · 2000 · 646 citations