Why Allow Planners to Do What They Do? A Justification from Economic Theory

Terry Moore

Journal of the American Institute of Planners · 1978 · 91 citations · 45 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Planning is often treated as unquestioned, yet many citizens do not share planners’ belief in its inherent value. The study aims to develop a clear economic theory of planning that reconciles planners’ and citizens’ perspectives, guiding scope and methods while improving planners’ satisfaction. The authors base their framework on the economic theory of public goods.

Abstract

Abstract Abstract There is little discussion among practicing planners about why they should plan. The goodness of planning is axiomatic—it has been elevated to the facts-exempt status of an article of faith. Unfortunately for planners, a significant number of the citizens for whom they would plan do not share this belief. A rigorous theory which explains why planning should be done in terms that are intelligible to both the planners and the planned can mitigate the conflict between them, provide suggestions about the desirable scope and methods of planning, and (not coincidentally) make planners happier individuals. The economic theory of public goods provides the rudiments of such a theory.

References

45