European Journal of Public Health · 2005 · 90 citations · 7 references
Public AffairsHealth PolicyPublic PolicyNutrition PolicyPhysical ActivityPublic OpinionPolicy Approaches To Obesity PreventionSocioeconomic Determinants Of ObesityWeight ManagementDelphi Technique VariantsEnvironmental Determinants Of ObesityExpert Opinion EvidenceHealthy Public PolicyObesogenic EnvironmentPolicy Approaches To Healthy EatingUse Of Experts
Obesity rates in Australia are rising, a trend that has drawn concern from researchers and policymakers and is linked to declining physical activity and changing food consumption patterns. The study aimed to elicit experts’ views on the key social trends driving obesity in Australia over the past five decades and to evaluate the usefulness of expert opinion for public policy. A modified Delphi approach was employed, involving semi‑structured interviews with 50 experts followed by a ranking round to identify and prioritize trends. Experts identified escalating car reliance, increasing busyness and lack of time, and rising use of convenience/prepared food as the most important social trends, noting divergent explanations for how these trends contribute to obesity.
Background: In Australia, as elsewhere in the developed world, researchers and policy makers have expressed concern about rising rates of obesity. Explanations for the increasing weight of the Australian population have focused on both declining levels of physical activity and changes in food consumption patterns. Methods: The primary aim of our study was to determine the views of obesity, dietary and physical activity experts, about the most important social trends that have contributed to Australia's obesogenic environment over the last 50 years. We used a modified Delphi technique to successfully contact 50 such experts to obtain their views on this topic. The process involved a semi-structured interview with each expert to identify the trends and then a round of ranking of the trends by these experts. A second aim was to comment on the utility of expert opinion in public policy. Results: The experts identified the most important social trends as ‘escalating car reliance’, ‘increasing “busy-ness” and lack of time’ and ‘rising use of convenience and pre-prepared food’. Because we asked experts to explain their responses, a diversity of opinion emerged on both the aetiology of these trends and how the environment is embodied to produce rising levels of obesity. Conclusion: We reflect on the implications of this dissensus for the utility of expert opinion in public policy and argue that one way through the smorgasboard of competing expert explanations for health differentials, including obesity levels, is practice-based evidence gathered through community level action research.
7
Boyd Swinburn, Garry Egger, Fezeela Raza · Preventive Medicine · 1999 · 2.3K citations · Full text
An “ecological” approach to the obesity pandemic
Garry Egger, B. Swinburn · BMJ · 1997 · 864 citations · Full text
A strategy for tackling health inequalities in the Netherlands
Johan P. Mackenbach · BMJ · 2002 · 194 citations · Full text