PLoS ONE · 2012 · 88 citations · 23 references
Public HealthInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyEarly DetectionMedical MicrobiologyHiv DiagnosisHiv TestingMycobacterial DiagnosticsTuberculosis CareTuberculosis DiagnosisTuberculosis Diagnostic TestingDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Testing AccuracyHuman Immunodeficiency Virus-associated TuberculosisMycobacterium Tuberculosis InfectionSputum ExaminationTuberculosis DiagnosticsUrine Sample CollectionUrine-based Diagnostics
BACKGROUND: Hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa are inundated with HIV-infected patients and tuberculosis (TB) is the commonest opportunistic infection in this sub-group. Up to one third of TB-HIV co-infected patients fail to produce a sputum sample (sputum scarce) and diagnosis is thus often delayed or missed. We investigated the sensitivity of urine-based methods (Xpert MTB/RIF, LAM strip test and LAM ELISA) in such patients. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 281 HIV-infected hospitalised patients with clinically suspected TB provided a spot urine sample. The reference standard was culture positivity for Mycobacterium tuberculosis on ≥1 sputum or extra-pulmonary sample. MTB/RIF was performed using 1 ml of both unprocessed and, when possible, concentrated urine. Each unconcentrated urine sample was also tested using the Clearview LAM ELISA and Alere LAM strip test. 42% (116/242) of patients had culture-proven TB. 18% (20/54) were sputum scarce. In sputum-scarce patients, the sensitivity of urine MTB/RIF and LAM ELISA was 40% (95%CI: 22-61) and 60% (95%CI: 39-78), respectively. Urine MTB/RIF specificity was 98% (95%CI: 95-100). Combined sensitivity of urine LAM ELISA and MTB/RIF was better than MTB/RIF alone [MTB/RIF and LAM: 70% (95%CI: 48-85) vs. MTB/RIF: 40% (95%CI: 22-61), p = 0.03]. Significant predictors of urine MTB/RIF positivity were CD4<50 cells/ml (p = 0.001), elevated protein-to-creatinine ratio (p<0.001) and LAM ELISA positivity (p<0.001). Urine centrifugation and pelleting significantly increased the sensitivity of MTB/RIF over unprocessed urine in paired samples [42% (95%CI: 26-58) vs. 8% (95%CI: 0-16), p<0.001]. Urine MTB/RIF-generated C(T) values correlated poorly with markers of bacillary burden (smear grade and time-to-positivity). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This preliminary study indicates that urine-based MTB/RIF, alone or in combination with LAM antigen detection, may potentially aid the diagnosis of TB in HIV-infected patients with advanced immunosuppression when sputum-based diagnosis is not possible. Concentration of urine prior to MTB/RIF-testing significantly improves sensitivity.
23
Catharina Boehme, Mark P. Nicol, Pamela Nabeta et al. · The Lancet · 2011 · 1K citations · Full text
Public Health, Internal Medicine, Diagnostic Microbiology +16
Grant Theron, Jonny Peter, Richard N. van Zyl-Smit et al. · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2011 · 312 citations
Stephen D Lawn, Andrew D. Kerkhoff, Monica Vogt et al. · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2011 · 301 citations · Full text