BIM Acceptance Model in Construction Organizations

TLDR

Building information modeling (BIM) is widely regarded as a tool that facilitates information sharing and reuse across a construction project’s life cycle, yet the specific factors driving its adoption remain unclear. This study proposes a BIM acceptance model (BAM) for construction organizations, developed through structural equation modeling. The model was derived from a literature review of technology‑acceptance theories, refined via interviews and pilot studies, and validated with 114 survey responses from South Korean construction professionals using structural equation modeling. The validated BAM provides a framework for evaluating and comparing BIM acceptance across construction organizations.

Abstract

Substantial research has been performed on the data standards and exchanges in the Architectural, Engineering, Construction/Facility Management (AEC/FM) industry over the past several years. The growing popularity of building information modeling (BIM) technology is based heavily upon the perception that it can facilitate the sharing and reuse of information during a project life cycle. Although many researchers and practitioners are in agreement about the potential applicability and benefit of BIM in construction, it is still unclear why BIM is adopted, and what factors enhance implementation of BIM. Thus, BIM acceptance and use remains a central concern of BIM research and practice. Therefore, we propose an acceptance model for BIM in construction organizations using structural equation modeling (SEM). The key components, including the BIM acceptance model (BAM), are identified through a literature review about technology acceptance-behavior related theories, and was then consolidated by interviews and pilot studies with professionals in the construction industry. Based on the components, a questionnaire was designed and sent out to workers in construction organizations (such as contractors, architects, construction managers, and engineers) in South Korea. A total of 114 completed questionnaires were retrieved. We used SEM for hypothesis testing. The validated BAM can serve as a foundation for positioning and comparing BIM acceptance research and provides users with a framework for evaluating BIM acceptance.