Signal‐to‐noise ratio and spatial resolution in x‐ray electronic imagers: Is the MTF a relevant parameter?

Abstract

In most imaging detectors, the modulation transfer function (MTF) is regarded as a good parameter to describe spatial resolution. This is undoubtedly valid for visual observation. However, the detectability of a detail is essentially a matter of signal-to-noise ratio, which is not accounted for by the MTF. In x-ray imaging, signal-to-noise ratio in the image is generally limited by incident photons statistics, often larger than readout noises. Therefore, the MTF of the detector applies to both signal and noise, and does not impair the image content. Contrast can easily be restored by image processing without altering the signal-to-noise ratio. However, a number of effects may alter very differently noise and signal: (i) If the MTF significantly extends beyond half the sampling frequency, the aliasing introduced by spatial sampling can severely enhance the noise and cancel the benefit of the good signal transfer. This is illustrated by synthetic images which simulate the response of imagers with different MTFs to the same test pattern in the presence of quantum noise. (ii) Parallax and blurring by the x-ray spot size or motion are shown to degrade the transfer properties of signal, but do not affect the quantum noise; they must be treated separately. Contrary to the x-ray converter MTF, parallax directly impacts the detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Finally, it is shown that only the detective quantum efficiency can reliably describe the spatial resolution of an x-ray imaging detector in the presence of noise, parallax and blurring.