Australian Journal of Public Administration · 1995 · 10 citations · 1 references
LawCriminal LawCriminologyCrimePolicingWhistleblower ProtectionCriminal MischiefFraud DetectionFraud ReportingPublic Employee Whistleblower ProtectionPublic Sector Whistleblower ProtectionWhistleblowingConspiracy PunishmentConspiracy ViolationsFraud Detection Through WhistleblowingPublic Sector Whistleblowing ProtectionsSenior Public OfficialsWhistleblower AllegationsWhistleblower Legal Protection
Abstract: This is essentially a “now it can be told” account of a massive fraud perpetrated on the Brisbane City Council in the mid‐1970s by six attendants in a council car park, who manipulated bundy clocks to falsify departure times on parking tickets surrendered by departing motorists. Because of bitter personal rivalry between two senior council officials, which was complicated by (i) strong support for one official at elected member level, (ii) the subsequently discovered domestic liaison of the latter official with one of the prime suspects, and (iii) bungling in the crown prosecutor's office leading to a judge's decision to throw out the initial conspiracy charge against the car park attendants, it seemed that they might be reinstated and resume stealing on a massive scale. A method of dealing effectively with the issue, involving “blowing the whistle” while protecting the identity of the whistleblowers, was therefore devised. As a result, the thieves were eventually charged and convicted individually. The senior official who advised against police investigation of the suspected fraud while concealing his relationship with a prime suspect was also punished. The paper concludes with a defence of the deception perpetrated by whistleblowers to protect themselves from possible retribution.
1
Lying: Moral choice in public and private life
Business Horizons · 1979 · 226 citations