Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: A reality check and a warning

Dietmar Stoian, Jason Donovan, John Fisk John Fisk, Michelle Muldoon Michelle Muldoon

Enterprise Development and Microfinance · 2012 · 92 citations · 6 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Value chain development has become a common strategy for reducing rural poverty, yet it often assumes that poor households have sufficient resources, face no trade‑offs, and can take on higher risks. The authors contend that value chain development for poor and vulnerable rural populations must be supported by new conceptual frameworks, analyses, and interventions. They recommend an asset‑based design, implementation, and assessment framework that identifies non‑market interventions to help disenfranchised groups meet minimum asset thresholds for participation. Their experience and literature review reveal that the prevailing assumptions rarely match the realities and needs of the poor.

Abstract

Over the past decade, the value chain development approach has increasingly been adopted by governments, donors, and NGOs to reduce rural poverty. The design of related interventions often assumes that poor households: 1) have sufficient resources to effectively participate in value chain development; 2) do not face substantial trade-offs when using these resources; and 3) are able to assume higher risks when reinvesting capital and labour. However, insights from our own experiences and the literature show that these assumptions often do not reflect the realities and the needs of the poor. We argue that value chain development with poor and vulnerable populations, particularly in rural areas, requires additional conceptual frameworks, analyses, and interventions. In particular, we encourage donor agencies and development practitioners to adopt an asset-based approach to the design, implementation, and assessment of target value chains and to identify the non-market interventions needed for enabling particularly disenfranchised groups to meet the minimum asset thresholds for their successful participation in value chain initiatives.

References

6