Development of the Patient Harvey Bradshaw Index and a Comparison With a Clinician-based Harvey Bradshaw Index Assessment of Crohn’s Disease Activity

Floor Bennebroek Evertsz, Céline C. M. Q. Hoeks, Pythia T. Nieuwkerk, Pieter Stokkers, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen, Claudi Bockting, Robbert Sanderman, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · 2013 · 100 citations · 10 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: The objective is to develop a patient-based Harvey Bradshaw Index (P-HBI) of Crohn's Disease (CD) activity and to compare it with the clinician-based HBI of CD activity in CD outpatients. STUDY: Consecutive patients with CD randomly completed the P-HBI either before or after the consultation. The gastroenterologist assessed patient's CD activity on the same day. Overall agreement between HBI and P-HBI was calculated with Spearman's ρ and Mann-Whitney U test. Agreement regarding active disease versus remission and agreement at item level was calculated by percent agreement and Cohen's κ. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one (response rate 88.3%) CD patients participated. P-HBI and HBI showed a large correlation (rs=0.82). The medians (interquartile range) of the total HBI (2; 0 to 4) and P-HBI (4; 1 to 7) were statistically significantly different (z=-8.411; P<0.001). Fortunately, in 82.6% of the cases this difference between clinicians and patients was not clinically significant (<3.2). The percentage agreement between clinician and patient, judging CD as active or as in remission, was 77%, rs=0.56, κ=0.52, indicating a moderate agreement. P-HBI and HBI on frequent extraintestinal manifestations in CD varied from less than chance (κ=-0.02) to a perfect agreement (κ=1). Patients tended to report more symptoms while completing the patient-based questionnaire compared to what they reported to the clinician during consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The P-HBI is the first step in developing a potential promising tool given its adequate agreement with the original HBI and its feasibility, especially in patients with low scores. Future research is necessary to develop a validated patient-based version studied in several patient populations.

References

10