Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

One‐Year Prospective Three‐Center Study Comparing the Outcome of a “Soft Bone Implant” (Prototype Mk IV) and the Standard Brånemark Implant

89

Citations

13

References

2003

Year

Abstract

The modified implant design resulted in an increased primary stability, which may be important when placing implants in jaw regions of type 4 bone. However, independent of the achieved primary stability, successful implants tended to approach similar secondary stability in the two designs tested.

References

YearCitations

1981

4.8K

1985

1.1K

1996

882

1997

421

2000

353

1999

317

1998

154

2000

142

1999

134

1999

134

Page 1