IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · 2014 · 265 citations · 33 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionFeature EngineeringSensor FusionAction RecognitionDecision-level FusionFeature-level FusionMultimodal InteractionAccelerometer SensorsActivity RecognitionDempster - Shafer TheoryDempster-shafer FusionDempster-shafer TheoryFeature FusionMultisensor Feature FusionSensor Decision Fusion
The study proposes fusing depth camera and inertial sensor data to enhance human action recognition. Computationally efficient action features are extracted from depth images (depth motion maps) and accelerometer signals (statistical attributes), then fused at feature and decision levels using a collaborative representation classifier and Dempster‑Shafer theory, and evaluated on the Berkeley multimodal human action database. The fusion methods improved recognition rates by 2–23% over single‑sensor baselines, demonstrating complementary sensor benefits.
This paper presents a fusion approach for improving human action recognition based on two differing modality sensors consisting of a depth camera and an inertial body sensor. Computationally efficient action features are extracted from depth images provided by the depth camera and from accelerometer signals provided by the inertial body sensor. These features consist of depth motion maps and statistical signal attributes. For action recognition, both feature-level fusion and decision-level fusion are examined by using a collaborative representation classifier. In the feature-level fusion, features generated from the two differing modality sensors are merged before classification, while in the decision-level fusion, the Dempster-Shafer theory is used to combine the classification outcomes from two classifiers, each corresponding to one sensor. The introduced fusion framework is evaluated using the Berkeley multimodal human action database. The results indicate that because of the complementary aspect of the data from these sensors, the introduced fusion approaches lead to 2% to 23% recognition rate improvements depending on the action over the situations when each sensor is used individually.
33
Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation
John Wright, A. Yang, Arvind Ganesh et al. · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2009 · 9.5K citations · Full text
Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems.
John B. Bell, V. Y. Arsenin · Mathematics of Computation · 1978 · 8.2K citations
Learning realistic human actions from movies
Ivan Laptev, Marcin Marszałek, Cordelia Schmid et al. · 2008 · 3.5K citations · Full text