Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Quality of Government and the Returns of Investment: Examining the Impact of Cohesion Expenditure in European Regions

373

Citations

32

References

2015

Year

TLDR

The study examines how government quality influences the economic impact of EU cohesion funds across European regions. The paper investigates the link between local/regional government quality and regional economic performance, focusing on returns from EU Structural and Cohesion Funds. Using primary data from the Quality of Government Institute and World Bank Global Governance Indicators, the authors estimate a two‑way fixed‑effects panel regression for 169 European regions from 1996 to 2007. The analysis shows that government quality directly drives economic growth and amplifies the effectiveness of EU cohesion funds, with a per‑capita threshold of €120 above which quality improvements become far more effective than additional investment, implying that many regions would need massive spending unless governance is strengthened.

Abstract

Rodríguez-Pose A. and Garcilazo E. Quality of government and the returns of investment: examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions, Regional Studies. This paper sets out to examine the relationship between the quality of local and regional governments and regional economic performance, linking government quality to the returns of European Union Structural and Cohesion Funds. Using primary data on government quality collected by the Quality of Government Institute, combined with World Bank Global Governance Indicators data, a two-way fixed effect panel regression model is conducted for a total of 169 European regions during the period 1996–2007. The results of the analysis underline the importance of government quality both as a direct determinant of economic growth as well as a moderator of the efficiency of Structural and Cohesion Funds expenditure. The analysis finds that both European Union investments targeting regions and quality of government simultaneously make a difference for regional economic growth, but that above a threshold of cohesion expenditure – calculated at more than €120 of cohesion expenditure per capita per year – government quality improvements are a far more important and realistic option for regional development than additional public investment. In many of the regions receiving the bulk of Structural Funds, further improvements in economic growth would require massive amounts of additional investment, unless the quality of government is significantly enhanced.

References

YearCitations

Page 1