Publication | Closed Access
Selection of Medical Students for Graduate Training: Pass/Fail versus Grades
38
Citations
1
References
1978
Year
Clinical SpecialtiesAllied Health ProfessionsSurgical ScienceEducationSurgeryStudent OutcomePass/fail ControversyProgram EvaluationSurgical ResidentsPerformance IndexEducational AdministrationUniversity Student RetentionMedical Laboratory ScienceSurgical Quality ControlSurgical TrainingOutcomes ResearchSurgical SpecialtyMedical StudentsHigher EducationSurgical CareMedical MalpracticeSecondary EducationContinuing Medical EducationHealth Profession TrainingMedicineEducation Policy
Abstract We analyzed the performance of two cohorts of surgical residents: one from "pass/fail" and the other from "graded" medical schools. A performance index indicates that the group from graded schools performed significantly better (P<0.001). No resident from a pass/fail institution ranked above the 87th percentile, and this group accounted for 82 per cent of those ranking below the 15th percentile. A residency training program that seeks excellence among its trainees would do well to select preferentially students who apply from medical schools providing a specific class standing as part of the total evaluation of the student. It is suggested that the pass/fail controversy is symbolic of the erosion of standards that inevitably occurs when the university becomes involved in transient sociopolitical turmoil (N Engl J Med 299:25–27, 1978)
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1