Sensors · 2011 · 62 citations · 26 references
Natural ResourcesForestryForest InventoryForest ManagementRemote SensingForest CoverImage ClassificationLand Cover ClassificationLand Cover MappingRemote Sensing Image AnalysisRemote Sensing ImageryClassification AccuracyForest Cover ClassificationForest Cover Type MappingMaximum Likelihood ClassificationPixel-based ClassificationSatellite Image ClassificationSatellite Imagery AnalysisSegmentation
This study investigated whether high-resolution satellite imagery is suitable for preparing a detailed digital forest cover map that discriminates forest cover at the tree species level. First, we tried to find an optimal process for segmenting the high-resolution images using a region-growing method with the scale, color and shape factors in Definiens(®) Professional 5.0. The image was classified by a traditional, pixel-based, maximum likelihood classification approach using the spectral information of the pixels. The pixels in each segment were reclassified using a segment-based classification (SBC) with a majority rule. Segmentation with strongly weighted color was less sensitive to the scale parameter and led to optimal forest cover segmentation and classification. The pixel-based classification (PBC) suffered from the "salt-and-pepper effect" and performed poorly in the classification of forest cover types, whereas the SBC helped to attenuate the effect and notably improved the classification accuracy. As a whole, SBC proved to be more suitable for classifying and delineating forest cover using high-resolution satellite images.
26
Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation
John Wright, T. M. Lillesand, R. W. Kiefer · Geographical Journal · 1980 · 7.3K citations
C. J. van der Sande, S.M. de Jong, A. P. J. De Roo · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2003 · 337 citations