Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations · 2015 · 10 citations · 9 references
BusinessDecision SciencesNuclear EngineeringDecision AnalysisMulti-criteria Decision MakingNuclear Fuel CycleEnergy Performance IndicatorsMulti-criteria Decision AnalysisNuclear Energy SystemsNuclear StrategyProject EvaluationReactor DesignClosed Fuel Cycle AnalysisComparative EvaluationFast ReactorsJudgment AggregationKey Performance IndicatorsMulti-criteria Performance EvaluationMulticriteria ComparisonMulticriteria Decision Analysis
This paper presents first results of the INPRO Collaborative Project on Key Indicators for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems, which has the objective to develop guidance and tools for comparative evaluation of the status, prospects, benefits, and risks associated with development of innovative nuclear technologies for a more distant future. Presented results illustrate expedience of application of the multicriteria decision analysis methods, which are able to provide the added value to comparative assessment of nuclear energy systems. First, the paper presents a short review of the multicriteria decision analysis methods appropriate to support judgment aggregation within comparative evaluations of nuclear energy systems based on key indicators and highlights the methodology to perform such assessments. Second, a set of key indicators elaborated in the INPRO Collaborative Project on Global Architecture of Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems Based on Thermal and Fast Reactors Including a Closed Fuel Cycle (GAINS) were evaluated for comparative evaluation of nuclear energy system evolution scenarios. Third, a numerical example is presented of application of the selected key indicators, methods, and tools for judgment aggregation in comparative assessment of the GAINS nuclear energy systems.
9
Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method
Jean Pierre Brans, Ph. Vincke · Management Science · 1985 · 2.7K citations