Judgment Aggregation
Judgment Aggregation is a formal framework in social choice theory that systematically combines individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a coherent collective judgment set, distinguishing itself from other aggregation methods by preserving logical consistency across the entire decision profile.
107
Publications
6.8K
Citations
131
Authors
110
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
19
107
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
Christian List, Philip Pettit · Economics and Philosophy · 2002 · 629 citations · Full text
Law, Jurisprudence, Mathematics +7
Lewis A. Kornhauser, Lawrence G. Sager · The Yale Law Journal · 1986 · 332 citations · Full text
1–5 of 107
131
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
18 publications · 2.1K citations
16
h-index
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
17 publications · 1.3K citations
16
h-index
9
h-index
8
h-index
6
h-index
1–5 of 131
110
London School of Economics and Political Science
London, United Kingdom
15 h-index
17 publications
1.5K citations

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Paris, France
9 h-index
11 publications
360 citations
Maastricht University
Maastricht, The Netherlands
9 h-index
9 publications
847 citations

University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
9 h-index
15 publications
509 citations
Princeton University
Princeton, United States
5 h-index
7 publications
608 citations
University of Luxembourg
Luxembourg, Luxembourg
5 h-index
8 publications
447 citations
Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics
Beijing, China
3 h-index
3 publications
486 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
137 citations
1–8 of 110
8 publications · 533 citations
8
h-index
Repository · 8 publications · 175 citations
8
h-index
6 publications · 635 citations
6
h-index
5 publications · 124 citations
5
h-index
3 publications · 677 citations
3
h-index
1–5