Judgment Aggregation

Judgment Aggregation is a formal framework in social choice theory that systematically combines individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a coherent collective judgment set, distinguishing itself from other aggregation methods by preserving logical consistency across the entire decision profile.

107

Publications

6.8K

Citations

131

Authors

110

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

19

Authors

131

  1. CL
    Christian List

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    18 publications · 2.1K citations

    16

    h-index

  2. FD
    Franz Dietrich

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    17 publications · 1.3K citations

    16

    h-index

  3. UE
    Ulle Endriss

    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    9 publications · 272 citations

    9

    h-index

  4. GP
    Gabriella Pigozzi

    University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    8 publications · 474 citations

    8

    h-index

  5. DP
    Daniele Porello

    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    6 publications · 172 citations

    6

    h-index

1–5 of 131

Venues

  1. Social Choice and Welfare

    8 publications · 533 citations

    8

    h-index

  2. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)

    Repository · 8 publications · 175 citations

    8

    h-index

  3. Synthese

    6 publications · 635 citations

    6

    h-index

  4. Journal of Logic and Computation

    5 publications · 124 citations

    5

    h-index

  5. Economics and Philosophy

    3 publications · 677 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5